.studio is a generic top-level domain aimed at creative work — design practices, recording studios, photographers, architects, yoga studios — and it is open to anyone with no eligibility check at all.
Search for it and you get registrar pages selling you a first-year discount, plus, oddly, an apartment complex in Austin that has out-ranked most of them. What none of those pages cover is the thing that decides whether a .studio was a good idea: the renewal price, and what a portfolio site actually needs from its hosting once the name is pointed somewhere.
Table of contents
- What .studio is and who it is meant for
- The renewal price is the whole story on new gTLDs
- Pointing a .studio at a portfolio site
- What a portfolio actually needs from its hosting
- Is .studio worth it
- How this fits the rest of the stack
- FAQ
What .studio is and who it is meant for
It is one of the several hundred new generic top-level domains that entered the root zone after ICANN’s expansion programme. Unlike a country-code domain it carries no geography, and unlike a restricted gTLD it carries no eligibility test — there is no verification that you run anything resembling a studio.
The intended audience is any practice that describes its workspace as a studio, which is a genuinely broad set: design, photography, film, music, architecture, fitness, ceramics, tattooing. In each case the appeal is the same — yourname.studio reads as a complete phrase, whereas yournamestudio.com reads as a compressed one.
That phrasing effect is the real product. A dot-word domain lets the extension carry meaning instead of being noise. It is also why the good short names went early: film.studio, sound.studio and their neighbours were never going to be available in year three.
The counter-argument is recognition. A meaningful minority of people still type .com reflexively, and a smaller but non-zero group treat unfamiliar extensions as suspicious. For a client-facing practice where the domain arrives by email signature or business card, this matters less than it does for a site people are expected to recall and type.
The renewal price is the whole story on new gTLDs
The pattern to watch for is a first-year price that is a fraction of the renewal. It is not a scam — the registry sets a promotional wholesale rate to seed the zone and registrars pass it on — but it means the advertised number is not the number you pay from year two onward.
Before registering, do this: find the registrar’s renewal price, not the registration price, and multiply by the number of years you expect to own the name. For a business domain that is a decade, not a year. A cheap registration attached to an expensive renewal is a subscription with a good headline.
Also check the transfer-out policy and whether the registrar’s renewal price is one you can escape. Transferring a domain to a cheaper registrar is normal and usually costs one year of registration at the new registrar’s rate, which resets the clock. The friction is real but it is not a lock-in.
Set the renewal to auto and put a calendar reminder a month before it fires anyway. Domains lapse most often not because someone decided to let them go but because the card on file expired and the notification went to an address nobody reads.
Pointing a .studio at a portfolio site
Mechanically, a .studio behaves exactly like any other domain. The records are the same, the certificate process is the same, and no resolver treats it specially. Anyone telling you a new gTLD needs different DNS handling is confusing it with something else.
The configuration for a typical portfolio:
- An A or ALIAS record on the apex pointing at the host.
- A CNAME on
wwwpointing to the same target. - A single canonical choice — apex or www — with a 301 from the other, so search engines and analytics see one site rather than two.
- A CAA record locking issuance to the certificate authority your host uses.
- A certificate covering both the apex and
www, issued via an ACME challenge.
The one step people skip is the canonical redirect. Serving the same portfolio on both yourname.studio and www.yourname.studio without a redirect splits your links, splits your analytics, and gives search engines two candidates for the same content. Pick one and redirect the other permanently.
What a portfolio actually needs from its hosting
A creative portfolio is an image-delivery problem wearing a website costume. The HTML is trivial; the photographs are not. A page with fifteen full-bleed images at native camera resolution is tens of megabytes, and no amount of clever CSS fixes that.
The three things that decide whether the site feels fast:
- Serving modern formats. A WebP or AVIF encode is routinely a third to a fifth of the equivalent JPEG at the same perceived quality. This is the single largest win available and it costs one build step.
- Serving the right size. A 4000px-wide original scaled down in the browser still downloaded 4000px of data. Generate a handful of widths and let
srcsetpick. - Lazy-loading everything below the fold, and explicitly not lazy-loading the hero image, which is almost always the largest-contentful-paint element.
Bandwidth is where an image-heavy site meets the invoice. A portfolio that gets shared once and does well can move a surprising amount of data in a week. Check what your host includes before it happens rather than after — the difference between a generous included allowance and a metered one is the difference between a good week and a bad bill.
For a site that is genuinely static — built once, served as files — a static host is the correct answer and the cheapest one. You do not need a server process sitting idle to serve photographs.
Is .studio worth it
For a practice whose name already ends in or implies studio, yes, and the reasoning is straightforward: you were going to put the word in the domain anyway, and putting it after the dot is shorter and reads better than putting it before.
For a business where studio is a stretch, no. Choosing an extension because it was available is how you end up explaining your domain in every conversation, which is the opposite of what a domain is for.
The honest middle case is buying .studio as a redirect to a .com you also own, which costs two renewals to protect one brand. Plenty of practices do it. Whether it is worth the second renewal depends on how much you expect people to type the name rather than click it.
Either way the domain is a fixed annual cost you can predict exactly. The hosting is the variable one, and it is the variable one that decides whether the portfolio loads in under a second or in four.
How this fits the rest of the stack
The domain is the small, predictable line. The image bandwidth, the build, the storage for the originals and the runtime for anything dynamic are the lines that move. The RunxBuild hosting calculator shows them side by side so you can see what a portfolio actually costs to serve before you commit to it. RunxBuild static sites build straight from a repository with 120GB of bandwidth included, custom domains and their certificates handled as part of the deploy, and headers and redirects configured in the same place — which covers the canonical redirect above without a separate service.
Useful related references:
- What Is a .link Domain, and When Does It Fit a Project?
- Domain Squatting: What It Is, What You Can Do, and What Is Not Worth Doing
- What Is a Parked Domain? And Why Yours Might Be a Liability
- Custom domains and certificates on RunxBuild
FAQ
Is a .studio domain good for SEO?
The extension itself is not a ranking factor. Search engines treat new generic top-level domains the same as .com. What affects rankings is the usual set — content, links, page speed, and whether the site serves one canonical URL rather than duplicating itself across apex and www.
Who can register a .studio domain?
Anyone. There is no eligibility check, no proof that you operate a studio, and no geographic restriction. It is an open generic top-level domain.
Why is the renewal price so much higher than registration?
Registries set promotional wholesale rates on new generic domains to encourage initial registrations, and registrars pass that discount to the first year only. Look up the renewal price before you register and treat that as the real cost, because it is the one you pay every year after the first.
Do I need a special certificate for a .studio domain?
No. Certificate authorities issue for new generic top-level domains exactly as they do for .com, through the same domain-validation challenge. If your host issues certificates automatically, a .studio works without any extra step.
Should I redirect www to the apex or the other way round?
Either works — what matters is that you pick one and permanently redirect the other. Serving the same content on both without a redirect splits link equity and analytics and gives search engines two URLs for one page.